> On Jan 19, 2015, at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> wrote: >> ...So make a list of the IPMC members >> you believe should judge the other 90%, and submit a proposal to the >> board to start a new project. Fork the incubator.... > > How is that different from pruning the current IPMC membership by > removing inactive members? > > I don't think those inactive folks are a problem, but if people think > they are it's easy to ask them if they want to stay, and remove those > who reply no or don't reply.
No one is saying that the problem is inactive IPMC members. No one. Isn’t it obvious what the above and IncubatorV2 proposal are about? Consolidating like minded individuals into a new IPMC and shutting out the other inconvenient members until "they come to their senses”. Frankly, if there are IPMC members that are a real problem then it’s the job of the VP of the Incubator to have a “chat” with them. Are there really so many that it warrants a reboot of the IPMC itself? Regards, Alan
