On 16/03/2015 09:53, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Arg! hit send too soon.
> 
> You should really check in with Hervé to confirm that Groovy was in the
> export. I am 99% confident that your issues and comments are in the XML
> dump, but you really should check with Hervé to be certain.
> 
> Also you may want to ask Mark Thomas what exactly is involved in
> preparing and doing such an import. Our own timelines for Maven's switch
> may not align with the Groovy incubation timelines... (mind you we are
> all at the grace of Ben for getting our timeline for the second export
> he committed to the Maven project)

The latest test export I have does not have any Groovy data in it.

Mark


> 
> On 16 March 2015 at 09:49, Stephen Connolly
> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> <mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On 16 March 2015 at 09:19, Cédric Champeau
>     <cedric.champ...@gmail.com <mailto:cedric.champ...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Thanks Stephen, sounds like a good news. For us the attachments
>         do not
>         matter much, there are not so many. However, keeping track of
>         comments is
>         very important, because some issues have a lot of discussions.
> 
>         2015-03-16 10:08 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly
>         <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
>         <mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
>         >:
> 
>         > On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org
>         <mailto:blackd...@gmx.org>> wrote:
>         >
>         > > Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira:
>         > >
>         > >> When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full
>         dump of the
>         > >> Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set
>         > >> up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy
>         issues are
>         > >> *included* in that? I.e. there’s not so much for you to
>         worry about
>         > >> here?
>         > >>
>         > >
>         > > Even if Stephen gets a full dump, this does not mean we will
>         get the
>         > > Groovy part out of it. Ben was so far telling us he cannot
>         give it out
>         > like
>         > > that, because of private and internal data in there. Instead he
>         > suggested a
>         > > json export (which most likely will not contain everything)
>         > >
>         >
>         > Well we are getting the full XML dump because that's all you
>         can get via
>         > the XML dump, but whether we get *all* attachments or only
>         those for Maven
>         > is a different question.
>         >
>         >
>         > >
>         > > So unless Stephy has this clear with his employee I stand on
>         the part,
>         > > that we don't have that.
>         >
>         >
>         > Clarification: Ben and I are co-workers.
>         >
>         >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > > bye Jochen
>         > >
>         > > --
>         > > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead
>         > > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
>         > > german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc
>         > > For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>         general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>         <mailto:general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
>         > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>         general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>         <mailto:general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
>         > >
>         > >
>         >
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to