On 23 July 2015 at 01:49, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:

> Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours
> window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it)
> I'd
> call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow
> with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc.
>
Agree the 72 hours is the key. But please it is custom when calling a vote
to set a deadline.

Congrats with the release.
rgds
jan i.


>
> Thanks
>   Cos
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> > Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of
> > Apache Zeppelin (incubating).
> > Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised
> > here, over the next release.
> >
> > I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is
> > it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to
> > consider?
> >
> > Best,
> > moon
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly!
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> > > > Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation!
> > > >
> > > > On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted
> > > > the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the
> > > > proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin
> > > > (incubating) codebase as a separate patch.
> > > > So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other
> issues
> > > > raised here, over the next release.
> > > >
> > > > Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more
> > > > comfortable with changing your opinion\vote?
> > > >
> > > > Please let us know.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Alexander
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >> Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression
> that
> > > > >> this particular contribution is covered by
> > > > >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53
> > > > >> (as we use the code from
> > > > >> https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that
> was not
> > > > >> merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution)
> > > > >
> > > > > It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have
> > > permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact
> > > particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This
> probably
> > > doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be
> sorted
> > > before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Alexander.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to