[trimmed response right now; in favor of getting a couple other voices] On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >...
> What is this, randomly propose changes to the incubator month? > Has nothing to do with the Incubator, but with how a PMC records its IP clearance. And more importantly, to clarify that a PMC is not beholden to the IPMC. > Let me repeat what I just said. I don't believe I was being obtuse, > but then again, you don't appear to have read what I wrote. > I certainly read it, you weren't being obtuse :-) > 1) I hope we can agree that an Officer of the corporation should be > subject to the direction of the Legal Affairs committee. > Agreed. >... > > My point is to make the document reflect the reality of our organization. > > Reality is what is reflected on this page: > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ > > Click on any of the clearance documents. > > I don't know what you are smoking, but those documents are real. > Of course. I didn't say "get rid of IP clearance". Please read my original email, if you think otherwise. I just want to alter the published steps to reflect that our TLPs are not beholden to the IPMC. We use the Incubator as a location to record these things (which I find odd, but is a separate discussion). >... Cheers, -g
