On 03.11.2015 09:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: >> ...Sentry started with 24 committers/PPMC. It hasn't added any PPMC members >> since its inception... > If that's correct I'm -1 on graduating Sentry. > > and earlier he wrote: >> ..The model that Sentry is pursing may work very well *for the existing >> members of the podling.* In my opinion, its process is entirely too >> opaque to allow for interested parties outside of the existing podling >> and companies interested in Sentry development to become involved... > Not having added any PPMC members seems to confirm that. > > Based on the information provided in this thread It looks to me like > Sentry isn't operating according to items CO20, CO40, CS20 and CS50 of > our maturity model [1].
Can we please stop calling someone's pet paperwork "our maturity model?" I'm fed up to the gills with the assumption that it has any relevance for anything or anyone in the foundation, including the Incubator and Podlings. -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
