> On Mar 20, 2017, at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > > +1 for a podlings@ alias. > > But what could you possibly want with a podlings-private@ ? We are > expected to keep private to a minimum, typically involving individuals or > security issues, and I fail to see how that can apply to 50 or so very > disperse projects, that changes over time. So I am -1 on that, until I hear > some reasonable justification.
I agree. Private matters will tend to be on a case by case basis. In the rare case where an all private email to all podlings must go out then each podling can be addressed one at a time via cut and paste. > > The pmcs@ alias is IMHO a bad alias and should be changed to go to dev@. > Way back in time, we had p...@foo.apache.org and the pmcs@ came out of that > naming. BUT, we later recognized that pmc@ was being overused. The name > invited that overuse and we changed it to private@ to signal its intent, > but pmcs@ was left behind… This is not an Incubator mailing list and therefore this is Off Topic. Regards, Dave > > > Cheers > Niclas > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:17 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:00 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Before I go ahead with it, wanted to see if others had any opinions. >> I'm >>>> planning to ask infra to create a podlings@i.a.o mailing list, which >>> would >>>> go to all podlings dev@ list. There may be some scenarios where we >> need >>>> to >>>> communicate out to all podlings. For instance, the logo change and how >>> it >>>> impacts the podlings. >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>> >>> This would be more like an alias, similar to @PMCs right ? Also, in the >>> past, some of these communications would go to podling private (e.g. Gsoc >>> info) where there was a request for the podling pmc to discuss this >>> appropriately in their dev lists? That might still be a viable approach. >>> >>> >> Yes, I believe that's how infra would implement it. It isn't meant to >> replace general@ but instead allow us a convenient way to email blast all >> podlings. >> >> As I was typing the email, I thought about private lists. I wouldn't mind >> a podlings-private@i.a.o as well. >> >> >>> BTW, podlings, particular podling mentors should (MUST) be following all >>> pertinent general@ discussions. >>> -- >>> Sent from my Mobile device >>> >> > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://polygene.apache.org <http://zest.apache.org> - New Energy for Java --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
