+1 (binding)
On 5/9/17, 8:50 AM, "Jakob Homan" <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 (binding) brought forward from the podling vote.
-Jakob
On 9 May 2017 at 08:26, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * sig/xsums OK
> * NOTICE ok, LICENSE is good enough (see below)
> * DISCLAIMER present
> * Incubating is in artifact name
> * Can build from source and could run tests
>
> * All of your additions to LICENSE (over "stock") are unnecessary. The
trap
> you fell into is differentiating between what Ratis *depends* on and what
> Ratis *bundles*. You do not bundle protobuf, grpc, slf4j, etc, therefore
you
> do not need to mention them in your release artifact. (If, at some point,
> Ratis releases a "binary" artifact that does include that software, you
> would need those entries in the LICENSE file bundled with that artifact)
> * The L&N files your bundle in your shaded jars (e.g. ratis-proto-shaded)
> are wrong for the opposite of the reason above (you include extra software
> but don't mention them in LICENSE/NOTICE). You should fix this for a later
> release.
> * Might you consider getting a website up for Ratis to help attract new
> community members? There's a template[1] which should make this much
easier.
> * A `mvn package` on a fresh installation dirties the workspace, causing
> subsequent builds to fail on the RAT check on the file
> `ratis-0.1.0-alpha/ratis-proto-shaded/dependency-reduced-pom.xml`. You
> should configure the shade plugin to create this file in target/
>
> When you finish the release, don't forget to populate a KEYS file in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ratis.
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template
>
>
> Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>>
>> Hi IPMC,
>>
>> The Apache Ratis community has voted and approved the proposal to
>> release Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0. We now
>> kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this
>> source-only incubator release.
>>
>> Apache Ratis is an open source java implementation for RAFT consensus
>> protocol. RAFT is being used successfully as an alternative to Paxos
>> to implement a consistently replicated log. RAFT is proven to be safe
>> and is designed to be simpler to understand.
>>
>> [VOTE] Thread:
>>
>>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f8a155337628018ee2ad1718c736c47d5dd3f2c2d4e7b1486ea9988b@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
>>
>> [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
>>
>>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eb0df0548299ae98e68c0067e43d9747a67e92a459cedbe55b56425d@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
>>
>> The git tag to be voted upon:
>>
>>
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-0.1.0-alpha
>>
>> The git commit hash:
>>
>>
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=52c4b6412df7daba82445db289f7b41e2216b4a6
>>
>> The source tarball with signatures and hashes can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.1.0-alpha/rc0/
>>
>> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
>> 2C33 A9CB 66AE AD59 3183 B01B 7843 4EF4 60D6 914B
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Obviously, I am +1 (non-binding).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tsz-Wo
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
