Hmm, well, but that usually only happens if it is clear that the vote should get cancelled.
LieGrue, strub > Am 22.10.2017 um 15:29 schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > > On 21 October 2017 at 18:27, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: >>> Even though there is no >>> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might >>> postpone a release as well, even after +1s. >> >> >> Yes indeed. Sometimes a single person discovers a problem during the voting >> process and casts -1. >> A -1 always should come with good arguments. >> Usually that leads to the others (who already voted) review this argument. >> And if it turns out to really be a problem which the others have simply >> overlooked, then they often amend their vote to a -1 as well. > > Or the RM can just cancel the vote if it's obvious that the problem is > sufficiently serious. > I don't think there is any need for additional -1 votes in that case. > >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 21.10.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Wade Chandler <wadechand...@apache.org>: >>> >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >>> >>> It is technically both with nuances. Time and 3 binding +1s plus a majority >>> +1s. The 72 hours is a participation enabler. The 3 bindings is the minimum >>> required, but a majority -1s would be a big deal. Even though there is no >>> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might >>> postpone a release as well, even after +1s. >>> >>> Wade >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2017 08:55, "Geertjan Wielenga" >>> <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding >>>> votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator. >>>> >>>> How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e., >>>> at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding >>>> votes, then the release of this specific repo that is one of the repose of >>>> Apache NetBeans is approved? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gj >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 IPMC binding >>>>> >>>>> LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good. >>>>> >>>>> However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with >>>>> java8 144 I sometimes get test errors. >>>>> All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator >>>>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http. >>>> server.NetworkListener >>>>> start >>>>> INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572] >>>>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer >>>> start >>>>> INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started. >>>>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451 >>>> sec >>>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org. >>>> netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx) >>>>> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec <<< FAILURE! >>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting: >>>>> null actual: Last >>>>> at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217) >>>>> at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest. >>>>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>>> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772 >>>> sec >>>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>>> rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx) Time elapsed: 0.067 sec <<< >>>>> FAILURE! >>>>> netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException: >>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException >>>>> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_ >>>>> html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>>> at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71) >>>>> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source) >>>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>>> at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275) >>>>> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$ >>>>> 60(Utilities.java:94) >>>>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >>>>> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext( >>>>> Utilities.java:94) >>>>> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method) >>>>> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115) >>>>> at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn. >>>> invokeImpl( >>>>> AbstractFXPresenter.java:418) >>>>> >>>>> Failed tests: >>>>> KOFx.run:73 ยป JS netscape.javascript.JSException: >>>>> java.lang.NullPointerExcepti... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Running the build for the forth time made it succeed. >>>>> I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test >>>>> setup. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> txs for rolling the release! >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's my +1 to release. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >>>>>> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach >>>>>>> <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator >>>>>>>> PMC vote to release:.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)= >>>>>>> fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jaroslav's GPG key is included in >>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
