We didnt change the headers (see https://github.com/WASdev/standards.jsr352.jbatch/blob/master/com.ibm.jbatch.container/src/main/java/com/ibm/jbatch/container/impl/RetryHandler.java). What would be a better mention in NOTICE?
Le 11 déc. 2017 07:26, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > > The root NOTICE references the donation but files are under apache v2 > > license anyway, even referencing IBM so should be good. > > OKish, perhaps, but given we’re taking about 120 or so files rather than > just a couple so I think it would be better if it was fixed. > > The NOTICE statement is there because the copyright line have been > relocated. [1] The Apache header used for ASF project is also different to > that used in external projects i.e. mentions contributor license > agreements. If some of the headers haven't changed then it’s unclear if > they were part of the donation or come from somewhere else. If they come > from somewhere else then that bit of Apache licensed software may have a > NOTICE file that would need to be looked at and parts possibly copied to > your NOTICE file. So have 120 or so files with IBM headers makes it a > little hard to review. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
