Hi Mark, > IBM developed a JBatch RI at github. They didn't officially submit their > JBatch RI as podling but just gave us the OK to do a 'friendly fork’
Thanks for that that’s clarifies what going on and looks fine to me. Not easy to review without that context however :-) > What we probably should do is to review all the (c) IBM files and check where > we did add some significant amount of work (surpassing the threshold of > originality). > For those files we should _additionally_ also add the (c) ASF to the headers > imo. Not a biggie, Not a biggie - you need significant changes before changing / adding an addition header but up to the PMC. See points 4/5 in [1] > I think there is no need to add anything to LICENSE as they are ALv2 anyway. See [2] it’s not required but recommended especially if it’s not ASF licensed. Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
