On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:26 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > ...FWIW, Jekyll is pretty heavily used across projects.... > > Yes, it's good to have a suggested default for this. > > OTOH the nice thing about the current setup is that people can use > whatever tool they want to create content: from emacs^H^H^H^H^H vi to > Jekyll, JBake, Pelican and many others there's choice depending on > people's preferences and that's great. > I don't believe this precludes using other tools. One of the things I learned from how ASF did CMS, its very useful to have a common entry point. If everything remains wrapped in a checked in build script (Jenkinsfile, shell script or otherwise) to avoid impacting your build tool, you're fine using the programming model. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
