Hi, thanks for your clarification. I can only speak for myself and I try to involve in discussions where I think I can be helpful or where I have a strong opinion (usually from the podling perspective). But, of course, I do not want to disturb things or annoy people on these lists, so I was a bit confused by the sentence, as it is, indeed, a public list.
If its these "drive-by comments" that arre annoying then I would name that so, e.g. "What seems less helpful in some cases is involvement of non-IPMC members which drop comments and leave the discussion then." But, I can also live with your clarification. Julian On 2019/04/09 08:31:03, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > The last sentence indicates that non-IPMC members should not involve on > > this list? Is this the case? > > Well we can’t stop them from being involved, and nor IMO should we, it is a > public list after all. And most of the time they can be useful and helpful, > it's just in some cases they are not. it was more a summary of the several > “drive-by comments” threads/conversations we had. > > > For me it reads like we as non-IPMC members should calm down on this list. > > Is this so? > > Why would you re-word it? Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
