+1 (non-binding)

- Ajantha

On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 4:37 PM Pierre Laporte <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding), casting my vote from the podling
>
> --
>
> Pierre
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 2:55 PM Robert Stupp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Mick for the gDoc/Markdown heads up.
> > It's something we could move to GitHub PRs, and possibly list the active
> > and previous ones on the project web site.
> > I've started a discussion about this on [email protected] (
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/yto2wp982t43h1mqjwnslswhws5z47cy)
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mick
> > >
> > > Totally agree with you. You are right that the podling used/uses Google
> > > Docs to easily collaborate (on proposals etc). You have a very good
> > point,
> > > and the project will moved the Google Docs as md file on the
> > repo/website.
> > > Thanks for the comments !
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:26 AM Mick <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Having gone through the discussions, project history, etc…
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My notes:
> > > >
> > > > a) Could we please avoid keeping long-lived / governance-relevant
> > project
> > > > information only in Google Docs (not ASF-controlled), e.g.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qBIxClspQA--uQB0MS3LQO-uEDjdXtbqMPSRNbgeKdk
> > > >
> > > > Using Google Docs for collaborative drafting is totally reasonable,
> but
> > > it
> > > > would be helpful to also copy or export a stable version into ASF
> > > > infrastructure (e.g., cwiki / a repo / an attached PDF) so the
> > project’s
> > > > governance history remains durable and accessible.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > b)
> > > > > I am a bit disappointed that we haven't yet discussed specific ways
> > to
> > > > improve our community dynamics or resolve disagreements more
> > > efficiently. I
> > > > have had many private conversations with community members expressing
> > > > frustration, and I was hoping this thread would provide a space for
> > that
> > > > reflection.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Fantastic to see this topic being raised explicitly.  Beyond meeting
> > the
> > > > formal graduation criteria, it’s important that the project keep
> > > investing
> > > > in how it communicates and resolves disagreements—consistently, not
> as
> > a
> > > > one-off—so the community stays welcoming, transparent, and healthy
> over
> > > the
> > > > long term.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 12 Feb 2026, at 07:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a vote to recommend graduating Apache Polaris from the
> Apache
> > > > > Incubator and establishing it as a Top Level Project (TLP) of the
> > > > > Apache Software Foundation.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a new vote replacing the previous one, following the
> > discussion
> > > > on
> > > > > this mailing list as asked (
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/04wo71ssltj4bcwm3tmd91d0xjpch4h8).
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Polaris has been incubating since 2024-08-09.
> > > > > The PPMC believes that the project has successfully completed
> > > incubation
> > > > > and is ready to graduate.
> > > > >
> > > > > The podling had a graduation discussion thread (
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7m9syd4dn4lnp6yb08s4j94xpyd7v777)
> > with
> > > > > valuable feedback received, now fully addressed with no outstanding
> > > > > objections.
> > > > >
> > > > > A consensus vote was taken (
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2z8ghf54y4p3sqvh2wwnzznhdbsq728l)
> > (27
> > > +1
> > > > > votes).
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a self-assessment on graduation criteria (
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qBIxClspQA--uQB0MS3LQO-uEDjdXtbqMPSRNbgeKdk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.h84wjuizn07
> > > > )
> > > > > including information on trademarks and branding.
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposed initial PMC members and PMC Chair has been discussed:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z12mj21gqpj4ytdp29r0qj1o7b5b5xsl
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposed project name is Apache Polaris (name approved by ASF
> > > > Trademark
> > > > > team).
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  Approve graduation of Apache Polaris
> > > > > [ ]  0  No opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  Do not approve (please state reasons)
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to