Hi

Thanks for the update !

As the LICENSE is not fully correct for cloudberry-backup (listing go
files), if it's not painful, I would suggest preparing a RC2 fixing the
issue.

Thanks again, much appreciated!

Regards
JB

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 12:25 PM Dianjin Wang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi JB,
>
> Thank you very much for your detailed review and the thorough check of our
> 2.1.0-rc1.
>
> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good. nit: in the LICENSE file there is a
> > typo: licenses/licenses/LICENSE-isc.txt instead of
> licenses/LICENSE-isc.txt
> > (double licenses)
>
> Good catch! We appreciate you spotting this. This is indeed a typo in the
> doc.
>
> > - cloudberry backup
> > -- No binary/compiled file found. NB: can you clarify if the tar.gz files
> > located in end_to_end/resources are required ?
>
> These files are required for our end-to-end integration tests. They are
> compressed formats of plain text data used as test resources. We prefer to
> keep them for test but will add explicit clarifications in a `
> README.apache.md` or similar documentation in future versions.
>
> > - cloudberry pxf
> > -- No compiled files. NB: the source distribution includes a few gz files
> > (tweets.tar.gz, ...). Also gradle-wrapper.jar should not be part of the
> > source distribution
>
> Similar to the above, these .gz files are also test files in compressed
> plain text format. For gradle-warpper.jar, we will see how to deal with it
> for better compliance without affecting the program building & running.
>
> > Just to be clarify:
> > 2. in cloudberry-backup, it's not clear to me where the go files are
> coming
> > from (the LICENSE mentions Greenplum, but doesn't list the go files). It
> > seems that the go files need the ASF header.
>
> You are correct. These Go files originated from the Greenplum project.
> Sorry for not explicitly listing them in a more detailed list in the
> `LICENSE`.
>
> BTW, would you recommend we cancel this RC and prepare RC2 to address
> these issues specifically, or would it be acceptable to include these fixes
> in the next release? We are prepared to roll out RC2 if you believe these
> points are blockers for the current vote.
>
> Thank you again for your guidance!
>
> Best,
> Dianjin Wang
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to