+1 binding On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote: > > > My +1 binding > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its name", which > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is done. Given > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users pinning it, > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep publishing > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something else... and > > >> who ends up owning that name. > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would reach out to > > all > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new asyncband crate. > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite straightforward. I don't > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead working on the > > > concrete migration work. > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to asyncband 0.6.7 > > since > > > they are logically identical. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149 > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; should be > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You may find it is > > "The > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at https://docs.rs/asyncband"; > > on > > > the proposal now. > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies. > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies because it > > shows > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband has been under > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate representation. > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual form is > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git > > > > > > Updated. > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background says "four > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and Core > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers tell one > > >> story. > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example. Answer has > > 111 > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now includes 18 > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these numbers should > > > be aligned? It is a common community status. > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1 > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5 contributors make > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git history, but he > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I count on him for > > > several significant decisions. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > mingcheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道： > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming concern, so I'm > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing during or right > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking: > > >> > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the crate has been > > >> downloaded more than 5M times. > > >> > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its name", which > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is done. Given > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users pinning it, > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep publishing > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something else... and > > >> who ends up owning that name. > > >> > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; should be > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies. > > >> > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual form is > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git > > >> > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background says "four > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and Core > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers tell one > > >> story. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> mingcheng > > >> > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi everyone, > > >> > > > >> > Following the discussion thread > > >> > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs), I > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator. > > >> > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here: > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal > > >> > > > >> > Please cast your vote: > > >> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator, because ... > > >> > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and only votes from > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from everyone are > > >> > welcome. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks! > > >> > > > >> > Best wishes, > > >> > Twice > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > -- > > Xuanwo > > > > https://xuanwo.io/ > >
-- Best Regards, - Hulk Lin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
