+1 binding On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote: > My +1 binding > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its name", which >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is done. Given >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users pinning it, >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep publishing >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something else... and >> who ends up owning that name. > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would reach out to all > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new asyncband crate. > The plan has been answered here and it's quite straightforward. I don't > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead working on the > concrete migration work. > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to asyncband 0.6.7 since > they are logically identical. > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149 > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; should be >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You may find it is "The > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at https://docs.rs/asyncband"; on > the proposal now. > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies. > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies because it shows > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband has been under > processed. This should be the proper intermediate representation. > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual form is >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git > > Updated. > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background says "four >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and Core >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers tell one >> story. > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example. Answer has 111 > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now includes 18 > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these numbers should > be aligned? It is a common community status. > > [2] https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1 > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5 contributors make > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git history, but he > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I count on him for > several significant decisions. > > Best, > tison. > > > mingcheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道： > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming concern, so I'm >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing during or right >> after the vote which none of them were blocking: >> >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the crate has been >> downloaded more than 5M times. >> >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its name", which >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is done. Given >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users pinning it, >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep publishing >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something else... and >> who ends up owning that name. >> >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; should be >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies. >> >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual form is >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git >> >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background says "four >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and Core >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers tell one >> story. >> >> Best, >> mingcheng >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > Following the discussion thread >> > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs), I >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator. >> > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here: >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal >> > >> > Please cast your vote: >> > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator >> > [ ] 0, I don't care >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator, because ... >> > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and only votes from >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from everyone are >> > welcome. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > Best wishes, >> > Twice >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >>
-- Xuanwo https://xuanwo.io/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
