At 04:08 13/2/01 +0000, Charles Benett wrote: >Hmm. Good idea, but I can't see it working for james, yet. There aren't >enough active james developers to keep up with daily changes in avalon. >James runs fine with the last release of Avalon, 3.1a1. If you like I could help keep them synched? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [GUMP] Any James developers here? Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Charles Benett
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Peter Donald
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Federico Barbieri
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Charles Benett
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Peter Donald
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Federico Barbieri
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Peter Donald
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Federico Barbieri
- Re: [GUMP] Any James developers here? Jon Stevens