-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<snip>
> Absolutely agree. However, a good portion of the world does not. We should
> strive to accommodate both camps. Could anyone explain what dual GPL/APL
> licensing really means? Thanks in advance, Ceki
I talked to a lot of people about this. Basically you include two licensing
agreements with the product. Prior to use the "user" must agree to one of
them.
There needs to be some warnings about the fact that the license you pick might
not be compatible with other software. You also should have a section about how
contributions to the product are accepted. You should say something about how
if you want to make a contribution your additions will have to be dual licensed
as well (even if you don't agree with the other license). Of course this isn't
too restrictive because the user/developer always have fork rights.
Kevin
- --
Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596
The unconstitutional government, for the corporation, by the corporation, must be
overthrown!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt
iD8DBQE6lhmpAwM6xb2dfE0RAtlcAKC2GwBupufKP0hNk2Rl+1ayMawTFACfUJ3V
+siUOBxBQ7wecAwBNLYnJWE=
=xZ/z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Hello to all my fans in domestic surveillance] Marxist nuclear
counter-intelligence CIA PLO Panama Khaddafi KGB Ft. Bragg quiche ammunition
Peking South Africa Saddam Hussein
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
