Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 3/3/01 7:01 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Also, it is interesting to note that the announcements
>> list does not set the ReplyTo header which is the common
>> practice on the other lists. Was that intentional?
> 
> In this case, probably yes because the announcements list is a moderated
> list. Therefore, where do you "reply" for discussion?

We could put a reply-to to General...

> p.s. I'm strongly in favor of the Reply-To: header because it fosters
> community by keeping the discussion on the list and I hate getting duplicate
> emails as a result of the fact that most mail clients CC the original author
> when the Reply-To-All option is selected.

Agreed... Don't even think about removing my beloved reply-to: header :) :)
(I hate the FnF's list only because of that... Grrrr...)

    Pier

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pier Fumagalli  <http://www.betaversion.org/>  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to