Ted Husted wrote:
>
> Personally, I'm concerned about how much actual work we can
> accomplish in synchronous time. Even with verbal meetings,
> going over the ASF minutes, agenda items were often postponed
> time and again for lack of synchronous time. With the
> granularity being a month, this can be a significant delay.
That's why the agenda should be posted early, and as much discussion as
possible take place prior to the agenda. If we "rat-hole", I will step in
and defer the discussion.
> If we don't need IRC or verbal meetings to build complex
> software products, why do we need it for the items on this
> agenda?
I'd like to give it a try. If it doesn't help, we can discontinue. OK?
> It's been my experience that a recurring deadline for a status
> report can serve the same purpose of a synchronous meeting,
> without the constraint of real-time scheduling.
That's why I want to crystalize this into a an official report. Without
it, action items tend to linger...
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
