If these people have comitter status, they could loose it
quickly. Why didn't they just append their name...
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]____
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:43 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Theft of authorship
>
>
>
>
>Hello,
>
>
>This comes up from time to time and usually has me jump
>through the roof. Good willing contributors, take a piece of
>existing log4j code, modify or enhance it, but remove the
>previous author's names. They then post their code as if it
>was their own. Regardless of how much they modified the code,
>by removing the previous author's names they are committing
>theft. I find this very disturbing. What do others think? What
>can we do to combat this phenomenon? Regards, Ceki
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
