on 8/7/01 5:47 AM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hopefully the information presented here will help you. I would stay
> away from JDK1.4 logging, and use either LogKit or Log4J which are of
> equal quality--but slightly different focuses and underlying concepts.
+1
Log4J also has a bit more visibility within Jakarta because it is a top
level project. Therefore, there is the *potential* that more developer
resources will be dedicated to it because people will find that project
first.
*Personally*, I like Log4J better at this point. The 25k .jar file with full
backwards compatibility to the enterprise edition also really makes a big
statement. You write your code to the 25k .jar API's and then drop in the
larger .jar when you need more features. You can't beat simple replacement
of a .jar file.
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
