Cedric,
Please see
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
before jumping to conclusions. Regards, Ceki
At 10:15 07.08.2001 -0700, Cedric Berger wrote:
>Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>> Tal Dayan wrote:
>> >
>> > Recently I saw an Avalon announcement regarding a logger kit. Is this is
>> > related in any way to the Log4J project ? If not, what are the key
>> > differences between the two ? And while we are on the subject, what
>> > are the differences between these two and the Sun logging API ?
>>
>> It takes a couple
>> iterations of an API to get it right, and Sun foolishly decided to include
>> the API without the real world testing and feedback. Almost all the other
>> APIs they included with JDK 1.4 have been released first as a separate
>> project--something that would have benefitted JDK 1.4 Logging.
>>
>> That really leaves you with LogKit 1.0b4 and Log4J 1.1.3.
>
>Nonsense.
>
>The JDK 1.4 logging API has not been developped by Sun, but
>by the JCP which includes many other corporations like IBM,
>which all have experience with logging APIs.
>
>I'm not gonna argue whether the JDK 1.4 logging is better or worse than
>LogKit or Log4j. But what I'm saying is that:
>
>1) I'm happy that we finally have a standard logging API included into
>the JDK, even if it's not the best one out there.
>2) Unless the JDK 1.4 API is completely broken, it will at some point
>become the standard and I am going to use it for all my new projects.
>
>BTW: somebody has released, somewhere, the classes of the JDK 1.4
>logging api for use with prior JRK releases.
>
>Cedric
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki G�lc� - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
