From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on 10/31/01 1:19 PM, "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/compare/petshop.asp > > > > Its not a very fair comparison (suprise suprise) but from a quick look at > > the source code, it seems MS achieve their performance gains by not using > > EJBs :-) > > Ok. Now that is funny. I got a good laugh out of that one. Hi Justy! > > > I wonder what the figures would look like if the PetStore were implemented > > along similar techniques using just regular JavaBeans and JSP... > > I wonder what the figures would look like if the PetStore were implemented > along similar techniques using just Turbine and Velocity... > > Velocity already had results show it to be faster than JSP.
I knew I shoulda said 'servlet' and not 'JSP' ;-) It would be interesting to have a Java competition - trying the various different techniques, tools and frameworks and seeing how each of them stack up to .NET. Comparing code complexity, performance etc. e.g. with beans or EJBs, with JDBC stored procedures or Turbine, with JSP or Velocity, then on a bunch of runtime platforms and databases and see how they stack up doing the same application. James _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
