On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ceki G�lc� wrote: > > > >- Sam Ruby > > > >P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml > >and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. > >Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we? > > +1 on the principle of merging Jakarta and XML. Agreed that it's definitely worth looking at. > However, you realize > there are technical considerations such as the look and fell of the > merged web-site. Sheesh ... just when I was starting to think that *nothing* could top the rancor of arguing about coding conventions ... :-) > Ceki G�lc� - http://qos.ch Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Sam Ruby
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Ceki G�lc�
- RE: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Gerhard Froehlich
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventi... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code con... Jon Scott Stevens
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code... Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Ted Husted
- RE: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Peter Donald
- Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions] Sam Ruby
