"Production quality" sounds MUCH better to me! Have fun, Paulo Gaspar
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:31 AM > To: general at jakarta > Subject: Re: Mission ... > > > Personally, > > While I don't have strong feeling about this, and a Mission statement is > what it is... > > I don't know that commercial-quality is a positive thing these days. > Alternatively, I'd say high-quality. Its a stupid distinction I know > but I've used some duds that were supposedly "commercial-quality" > (especially from *cough*microsoft*cough* the big vendors). I feel > Jakarta should champion OS software as being equal to or better than > "commercial-quality" even when OS software is commecial (if that makes > any sense). Like I said pedantic but it just stuck out at me. > > -Andy > -- > www.superlinksoftware.com > www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html > - fix java generics! > > > The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to > vote. > -Ambassador Kosh > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
