+1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) Nothing but good has come out of it so far so why mess with a good thing?
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:57, Conor MacNeill wrote: > The first order of business for the new PMC is the election of a Chair. > > Would all PMC members indicate if they would be willing to act as Chair for > the next 12 months. Once each PMC member has indicated their availability, > we can proceed to an election. > > If there are more than three candidates, I propose a preferential voting > system where each PMC member gives numbered preferences. If no candiate has > a clear majority, the votes from the candidate with the least number of > votes are distributed according to the indicated preferences. This process > continues until one candidate has a majority (4 votes). > > If you are not happy with this process, that's OK - just -1 this email and > propose an alternative. > > Conor -- Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | Hlade's Law: If you have a difficult task, give it | | to a lazy person -- they will find an easier | | way to do it. | *------------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
