On 3/14/02 3:55 AM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) +1 I also will state that I am willing to act as chair, as I wouldn't ask Sam to do something that I wouldn't also do myself. However, I would greatly prefer if Sam did it for another year. :) geir > Nothing but good has come out of it so far so why mess with a good thing? > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:57, Conor MacNeill wrote: >> The first order of business for the new PMC is the election of a Chair. >> >> Would all PMC members indicate if they would be willing to act as Chair for >> the next 12 months. Once each PMC member has indicated their availability, >> we can proceed to an election. >> >> If there are more than three candidates, I propose a preferential voting >> system where each PMC member gives numbered preferences. If no candiate has >> a clear majority, the votes from the candidate with the least number of >> votes are distributed according to the indicated preferences. This process >> continues until one candidate has a majority (4 votes). >> >> If you are not happy with this process, that's OK - just -1 this email and >> propose an alternative. >> >> Conor -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "Now what do we do?" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
