Costin, Morgan, Rodney, Thanks for the lively discussion and sharing your points of view. My intent was to warn users of the dangers of using common-logging. I have done my bit. Cheers, Ceki
At 16:31 27.03.2002 -0600, Morgan wrote: >I believe the order of precedence is well documented. I think the logging >component would benefit from warning messages when a default implementation >is selected (like Log4J warns you when there is no log4j.properties file >available), but this doesn't require any fundamental change to the API. > >If you want to take about confusion and despair, look at the environment >that's running three logging implementations simultaneously. > >- Morgan -- Ceki My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
