Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>>
>> Translation:
>>
>> Jakarta = jakarta.apache.org
>> XML = xml.apache.org
>>
>> And the reason on XML.apache.org there is no discussion is:
>> everyone seems to be on board with Forrest--which is using Centipede.
>>
>>
>
> Yeah so why can't these work together? I still just don't get it. "Gee
> we don't like that lets do our own thing or integrate with anything but
> this or that". It just baffles the crap out of me.
> If I had the choice. I'd use NEITHER. I choose Centaven WITH GUMP.
Fine. The history is that Forrest was in motion before I even knew
there was such a thing as Maven. I know the folks involved with
Forrest, and they are top notch people. The whole purpose of Forrest
is to work with GUMP. (Notice the synergy: Forrest Gump).
Forrest was started and talked about publicly on the general@xml
list before it was even started. That is something that somewhat
perturbs me about the Turbine projects. SOmething with Maven's
scope and ability should have been talked about publicly instead of
sneaking up on us. When we get the message "convert all your
projects...", that would definitely catch alot of people off guard.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
