I would actually prefer no peer review (or at least no binding peer review). If people want to have a say what goes into it then they should get off their butts and write something for it ;)
I am sure that the writers will be at responsible enough (and if not we can yank their privlidges to post it to announcement list) At 04:19 PM 6/5/2002 +0100, you wrote: >"Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jakarta Newsletter > > ================== > > Issue: 0 > > Date: May 2002 > >Great job... I'd like to propose the following: peer review on this mailing >list, vote request, and then send it off on announcements... This can be >done every month if Rob is willing to keep up with the pace of my flamewars. > > Pier > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
