"Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 05:16, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>> On 26/9/02 3:04, "Scott Eade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am in the process of tidying up the issue tracking systems used by the
>>> turbine projects. The biggest change is that we are predominantly going to
>>> use an instance of the turbine based Scarab issue tracking system (from
>>> tigris.org) that is installed at werken.com (Bob McWhirter's site on a box
>>> belonging to Bob and Jason van Zyl - thanks guys). This instance was set up
>>> as it apparently proved difficult to gain the necessary access to maintain
>>> the Scarab instance at issues.apache.org/scarab.
>>>
>>> Bob has suggested that we set up an apache.org hostname for the box to make
>>> it easier if it becomes necessary to migrate to another system in the
>>> future. I thought it would be a good idea to run this past the general
>>> Jakarta list prior to making a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> In summary here is what we want to do:
>>>
>>> 1. Request the host name scarab.apache.org be set up to point to the same
>>> address as scarab.werken.com
>>> 2. Update http://issues.apache.org/ to de-emphasise the
>>> issues.apache.org/scarab install (now used only by OJB) and to include a
>>> reference to the new scarab.apache.org instance (note that OBJ guys are
>>> being invited to migrate over to the maintained Scarab instance).
>>> 3. Organize for bugzilla to no longer accept turbine issues.
>>>
>>> Please speak up if you have any comments or concerns about this. It has
>>> been discussed on the turbine-dev list with no objections.
>>
>> We already have a setup of Scarab on nagoya.apache.org, which of course is
>> _already_ has an alias as issues.apache.org....
>>
>> If you want to use scarab, use nagoya and update that installation, let's
>> not redo the whole thing again and again and again...
>
> We're not doing it again and again. We're doing it once more in a place
> where we know that we can get hold of people taking care of the box and
> don't have to deal with a Sun box. There are a group of us taking care
> of that machine and we would prefer to do it there than have it on
> nagoya. I am personally against putting anything on Nagoya as getting
> hold of you has proved difficult at times (I'm well aware you're
> volunteering your time) and I hate Sun boxes and find them amazingly
> annoying to work on. I would like to dump the scarab install on nagoya
> and use the rackspace managed box that we have. It's just less work for
> everyone and we are more comfortable hosting Scarab there.
Fine... Less work for me... Want to get also BugZilla and Eyebrowse on
there?
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
