I made a request for access to nagoya so that I could take over maintenance of the scarab installation there. I never heard back from you; I would/should have followed up, but Jason made the offer of the werken.com box so I took him up on it.
I don't see a reason to keep two instances of scarab going. No one is maintaining the one on nagoya. And if the decision is going to be that it has to be on nagoya or else... I will work towards that as I see no reason to fight over it. I like the werken.com setup of linux and a working up-to-date emacs installation, but hopefully nagoya at least has the later? john mcnally On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:10, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "Scott Eade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> On 26/9/02 3:04, "Scott Eade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> This instance was set up > >>> as it apparently proved difficult to gain the necessary access to maintain > >>> the Scarab instance at issues.apache.org/scarab. > >> > >> We already have a setup of Scarab on nagoya.apache.org, which of course is > >> _already_ has an alias as issues.apache.org.... > >> > >> If you want to use scarab, use nagoya and update that installation, let's > >> not redo the whole thing again and again and again... > > > > As stated in the original message, it was deemed to difficult to obtain the > > necessary access to maintain the instance on nagoya. As things currently > > stand we have the nagoya instance that is un-maintained with only one > > project using it and we have the up-to-date werken instance with one project > > actively using it (and four more that have agreed to) and two people > > committed to maintaining it. The newer instance is hosted at a very ASF > > friendly location who are happy to provide their resources and the access > > necessary to maintain it. Why not follow the path of least resistance? > > Sorry, if you had troubles accessing Nagoya, it has been most definitely my > fault. The original idea to set up Scarab on Nagoya was that once some > projects had the confidence of the install, all other projects would have > moved as well, so, I still think that installing it on a central location is > a good idea... > > If you, Jason and Bob want to maintain that instance, just let me know and > I'll grant appropriate karma, otherwise, I believe that at the end we'll > have 3 bug tracking systems: two on nagoya, and one wherever you guys want > to put it... :-/ > > Pier > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
