On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 17:53, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Being the big moron I am, I don't see any of these issues to be as > important as: 1. Do they develop in "the apache way", 2. Is it a > vibrant robust community, 3. Is there any point at all. . . >
The point is apache had a project with similar ideas and it died. Was it ahead of its time? Or are there fundamental problems with the approach that still exist? I am willing to accept that it was just too large an undertaking at the time - about 4 years ago, for the developers involved. But I would be happier, if Howard pointed out why Tapestry is setup for success when a precedent exists that proves developing a community around such an idea is difficult. john mcnally -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
