I have taken a closer look at Tapestry and it does provide a quite a different strategy for web application development than Turbine and probably also Struts. It's very well documented and the code looks well written also. I would be willing to drop my -1; I would like to hear a comparison with the failed spfc project though.
<http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/java-spfc/docs/index.html?rev=1.10&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup> It seems like a similar idea, or am I wrong? I liked the idea of spfc. Though the change in perspective needed to think of a webapp in terms of event driven components was considered too great a stretch, I guess. Is such an approach gaining more acceptance, or have I missed the point of Tapestry? john mcnally On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 16:22, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 19/10/02 19:49, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So could someone clarify that for me... We're here to promote community > > software development....as long as they don't overlap? sorry I totally > > misunderstood the apache way. (especially with all the overlapping > > projects to the contrary) > > I want to start a new project for a new Servlet Container that is not > Tomcat! :-) Let's see how many fans I'm going to get! :-) > > Pier > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
