On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:

> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:21:03 -0500
> From: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property
>
> Gump is now two years old.  It has had contributions from over a dozen
> people, about a half-dozen this month alone.  There seems to be a
> renewed interest in gump (some in response to a little nudging <grin>).
>
> Considering all of this, what I would like to propose is that the
> contents of jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump get moved to jakarta-gump,
> all committers to any jakarta code base be given karma and voting rights
> on the full contents (descriptors, code, and stylesheets alike) and that
> a single [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing be created (we are all devs
> here, right?)
>
> Thoughts?
>

I like the idea of Gump becoming community property, but should it really
be only for Jakarta committers?  I'm thinking in particular about groups
like Ant and Avalon (recently "graduated" into full fledged Apache
projects), as well as the XML packages that Gump also watches over.

> - Sam Ruby

Craig McClanahan



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to