On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > > project. I do kinda think a project proposal might be premature since > > the specification isn't public yet. > > I was trying not to post the obvious, but yes: this seems largely > premature. No code, a restricted community, too much committers coming > from one company, I've seen better proposals being fought over lately. > Also, possible future integration 'ideas' with some related projects > would be comforting (Jetspeed, Tomcat, Struts/Tiles, and the Cocoon > portal framework for a starter). Is this different from Tomcat and/or JSTL? If so, how? I'm clueless on portlets, but from my 'vague consumer' view, I thought the JSR was standardising a lot of what Jetspeed does. Are there any Jetspeed people on this JSR? Or is it a competing viewpoint? [much like the Log JSR suddenly wanting to turn Log4j into their reference]. Would Jetspeed use Charon/Pluto, or would the fact that it's an RI limit Jetspeed? I'm assuming Tomcat and JSTL had a number of Apache people in the JSR, if this one doesn't, then it seems that it's a sourceforge concept. "We'd like an open source RI, let's host at Jakarta, they do open-source RI's". Is this not-invented-here-ism or maintaining scope? Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
