I've noticed that Gump distributes (via gump.covalent.net) several jar
files which appear to violate the license agreements found in the
projects.
- xmlunit: The license requires:
"* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
with the distribution.
"
- Various xdoclet jars:
"Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
this
list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
and/or
other materials provided with the distribution."
- Werkz:
" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the
above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
materials provided with the distribution."
I'm sure there are many more.
Can someone please comment?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
