On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 09:13 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
one of the problems we have in the commons is the number of votes which spawn threads which go on for ever without any clear conclusion. that's why i think that announcing clearly when a vote is finished is a good thing.robert burrell donkin wrote:the following committers have passed the PMC nomination vote proposed by sam ruby:
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan Delagrange
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
- James Strachan
- Jason van Zyl
- Ted Husted
- Rod Waldhoff
i'm sending this to let you all know.
the role of jakarta PMC is changing but rather than give an opinion and pretend some authority i don't have, take a look at this thread:
What do you means by passed the PMC nomination ?
this particular round of voting starts with sam: http://marc.theaimsgroup.
com/?l=jakarta-general&m=104518242028805&w=2
sam suggests that the vote is finished here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
?l=jakarta-general&m=104569451208501&w=2
why forward the result to the relevant people?
in the last round some people elected were never even informed. i think that the people should be informed:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=104568409524148&w=2
sam replies:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=104568599627074&w=2
so that's why i forwarded the result to everyone concerned.
is this an experiment which shouldn't be repeated?
or does it just need refining?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
