On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > Sam said that we should obtain "nominations for chair > > from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by > > the 16th," followed by "[a]n election where every > > member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on > > the 18th." > > > > Whoops, we're late. > > > > Are we obligated to choose a chair this month. I > > don't think we have enought time left for a proper > > vote. > > The board places no such obligations upon the Jakarta PMC. > > My read is that if an election were held today, I would be running > unopposed. Instead of going through the motions and having a one party > election, I would much rather go "month to month"... in other words, if > any PMC member wants to call for an election at any time, it's OK with > me. Futhermore, should a suitable candidate emerge, they would have my > vote and full support. Sounds like you want some peace and quiet Sam :) It might help if you were to indicate what the role of Chairman entails. In terms of time, resource etc. Being a member is, I assume, a given, but are there timezone considerations, company-backing considerations which help a lot. Do you find yourself listening to every mailing list, how much of your Apache time is eaten by Chairman-ness rather than project-work. Then maybe it'll indicate to people whether they have an interest, and how long they'd desire to serve etc. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
