Is this reply FAQ/Wiki'd somewhere? Seems to me to be a good set of questions to ask of an LGPL project to cause happiness all around. Assuming it's okay with the powers that be, boards/committees/usuals.
Hen On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits linking > and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users, etc etc? Is > he the copyright holder? > > If so than you should be good to go (from my understanding). (As the > copyright holder he can explicitly address the issues that are of concern) > > Aslak Helles�y wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >As you might know, the XDoclet team is preparing for Jakarta membership (for > >XDoclet 2), and we're trying to sort out some political issues before we do > >so. (You can read about XDoclet 2 on TSS today). > > > >XDoclet 2 needs a DTD parser, and the only decent (actually great) DTD > >parser we have found is Mark Wutka's DTDParser > >(http://www.wutka.com/dtdparser.html). It's LGPL. I've heard that LGPL is a > >no-no for Jakarta projects. Would XDoclet's depending on Wutka's DTDParser > >(with its current license) rule out our possibilities for Jakarta > >membership? > > > >(As a side note, we're depending on a dozen Jakarta (commons) libraries). > > > >Cheers, > >Aslak > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
