Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 +0000 > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out > > there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be > > inclined to add both formulations. maybe this would be a good question > > to raise on community... > > Go ahead. I suspect it that we should modify site.vsl > in either case. :-) > > If we decide to modify all the xml files in /xdocs/, > appending <link rel="license" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/LICENSE"/> > line would be more practical ... under /document/properties/ element. > (generated htmls should have <meta> tag, <link> tag or something equivalent) >
The instructions at the very end of <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html> describe *exactly* what to do to documentation files, and adding a link in the manner you described is the wrong answer. Instead, you should enclose the same boilerplate text at the top of each such document that is included at the top of Java sources, enclosed in the appropriate comment characters for your format (i.e. for XML, surround by "<!--". and "-->", for properties files, prefix by "#", and so on). > -- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Craig McClanahan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
