On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:39:27 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 22:03:57 +0000, robert burrell donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 21:24, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > > +1 on this change in general > > > > +1 > > > > though (for some reason) i find the aesthetic a little unbalanced. > > > > i'd be inclined to prune. > > +1. Probably still too noisy on the front page.
I've pruned. > > the link to the archives duplicates content already present on the > > sub-projects pages. the nightly builds could be moved onto those pages. > > +1 to nightlies being at a lower level. They're now there. > Archives should stay at the top level as it links to Jakarta archives > and not others. But I've made it an ad-hoc link in the text, rather than giving it its entire section. > > the covalent link could be removed (i'm not even sure whether covalent > > still runs gump.) > > It doesn't. I fixed it to the correct link a while back. Kept this on the main page for the moment. I've also added a 'browse download area', inspired by xml.apache.org's download page wording, to each subproject. http://jakarta.apache.org/~bayard/jakarta/site/downloads/download.html Thoughts? I suspect I should css some spacing between the list items now; they get a bit crammed. Other than that, my todo's before proposing we replace this are: 1) Get Ant copying the download.cgi (or another way to get the cgi to work for each file). Not even sure if copies of the download.cgi will work. 2) Fix missing ul tags on sub-sub-project pages. Tomcat, Velocity, Commons etc. Immediately following the move, I'd then probably: 1) Improve the Taglibs download pages to be similar to the Commons download pages. 2) Start suggesting that subprojects link to their subpages and not to the top one. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
