On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Almost completely +1.
One thing first : http://java.apache.org, redirects to archive.apache.org,
while I still know people that are think java stuff stuff on apache.org is
happening there, so maybe a redirect to a more friendly page could take place
there ? (though this could be something for infrastructure/board).
Hmm. I'll mention it, there might be legal issues in active use of the
name.
Henri Yandell wrote:
* Improved Committer->PMC process. Chair's responsibility (I've failed at
this so far) is to turn around the new committer process. A new committer
of 6 months is effectively voted against going to the PMC, not for. Might
not be able to make it exactly that way, but the idea being that joining
the PMC is the exception, not the norm. Personally I'd like to see
committership be removed if people repeatedly are not allowed onto the PMC.
Just to make sure I get what you are saying : If you become a committer on
jakarta, a vote will be helt automatically after 6 months (initiated by
you/the Chair?), but not to accept the committer, but to not accept the
committer becoming a member of the PMC ?
That's effectively the level I'd like to take it to. Really drive home the
'everyone should be on the PMC' meme. It's not much different than what
could exist today; ie) the chair calling votes based on time since
committership; so it's not a biggy - the important part is making a smooth
pipeline to the PMC.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
