On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
-=-=-=-=
Mostly I'm worried about:
PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+)
<snap/>
s/Inactive/Active/ ?
Well, I'm worried about Active committers who are not on the PMC you're
right :) #1 issue.
The above meant, those are the three sets I think need to be emeritus'd.
The 200+ would be wrong then as it includes the smaller number of active
committers who we need to get on the PMC.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
