On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote: > > > > > > > I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39" > > > > For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was > > really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP. > > I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a > result > > of all the reorganisation, and wasn't killed off because we failed to > > provide adequate oversight while we carried out the controlled expansion > of > > the PMC. > > On the one hand I think it may be time for me to move on, on the other > hand > > I think that Jakarta PMC might benefit from the continuity provided by > > letting the interest of me and the others like me fade away as Jakarta > > continues to evolve. > > > > Whatever I think, I would happily relinquish my PMC vote if the active > PMC > > members think it would help in any way. > > Personally, I think that as long as we don't have to have any form of > quorom, and as long as the inactive PMC member is on the mailing list > (which really means they're not completely inactive), then it's not a > problem. > > We do need quorom on one issue: "The Chairman or any member may be removed > from the PMC by a 3/4 vote of the PMC." > > Of course, we only have 60% active right now, so presuming only committers > to the current Jakarta voted, that line of the charter would be > impossible.
What, you think we're going to let you off the hook as PMC Chair any time soon? Ha ha ha! ;-) -- Martin Cooper Not a biggy I think, I think the chair can sidestep the charter if the > community allowed it and removing the chair is more about the PMC sending > a vote of no confidence to the board regardless of %, the board's > interpretation of that vote would be subjective. > > ie) I doubt a chair could be removed for doing what the board said had to > be done. 75% or no 75%. :) > > It's one of the places where Jakarta modelled itself on the ASF, but isn't > the same as the ASF. > > -=-=-=-= > > Mostly I'm worried about: > > PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful) > PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon) > Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+) > > Hen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
