On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:Inactive Subprojects * CactusCactus is more on a 'Hibernation' status; I agree there hasn't been activities in the last weeks, but we have some stuff planned (for instance, I should have relased Cactus 1.7.2 to fix the jboss-j2ee.jar issue, but couldn't do so yet...)
This is true of most of our inactive codebases - and it will stay that way if we let them wait quietly on their -dev lists for time to show up.
I've screwed up in forgetting the jboss-j2ee jar issue; should be yelling at you guys to get that release done :) For something like this, it's essential that we're talking about it on general@ and not on cactus-dev.
If something has been in Hibernation status for a period of time, the only real hope (imo) is to declare it inactive and see if that shocks the committers into doing something.
I've meant to do something about my PGP problems for 2 years or so. It's only the embaressment of admitting that it's just a couple of evenings worth of work to fix them and a couple of USB keys at the supermarket that have kicked me into dealing with it.
Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
