On 04/03/07, Rainer Klute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel F. Savarese schrieb: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: > >> lists. (If you disagree look at the list archive for >> each over the last 6 months and see if you REALLY disagree in more than >> THEORY). >> > > At least for oro, some Linux distributions continue to ship it as part of > their core packages. For example, Fedora Core 4, 5, and 6 all included > it and 7 will include it as well. That's millions of real installations.
</snip> There are also packages and applications (e.g. JMeter) which use ORO and which are still active. Same applies to them.
I strogly agree with Daniel. Even if there are no ongoing activities on a project, we should never, NEVER call it "dead" or give it any other attributation with a negative tone. "Dormant" also has negative implications. "Mature" would be fine.
+1 And/or "Stable". Just not Retired or Pensioned off or Redundant or past-it ;-) S/// --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
