On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote: >> * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb. >> >> A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going >> to the Attic, and if not send it to Commons where it will have more >> chance of activity. >> > Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF. > There are no bugs oustanding against BSF 3.x. > Not sure it is worth fixing any of the 2.x bugs. > Please wait a little bit. It has been a long time intent to fix the few bugs in 2.x and add the enhancements in JIRA to it. Maybe also creating a JSR-223 bridge to allow BSF 2.x engines to be used in JSR-223 environments (not sure whether this is worthwhile, but it may be the case that there are 2.x engines for which no JSR-223 engines exist).(Just have not been able to push this more to the front of my table; have a 2.x engine in use that has the bugfixes incorporated and I would like to apply them to the official 2.x.
---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
