On 10/28/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
I think (hope) we have subscribers in list that are not interested in
James but want to discuss and partecipate in votes about the mailet apis.
I'm not a big fan of mailet apis as a separate project from James, but
if we want to have a mailet api project that has its own workflow, and
maybe ever a separate team (maybe some other implementation author) imho
a specific mailing list must exists and a specific website would be even
help.
We either separate it from James server or we don't. I don't think we
should yet, because it isn't complete enough in itself to allow anyone
to really use Mailets in another context. Therfore I'm in favour of
leaving it for users, and working on server-dev@ until we have got the
API complete enough to move into its own sub-project.
d.
